Lack of Safety Documentation: MCPS has been telling parents that WiFi is safe, but MCPS simply cannot make this claim. The FCC admits there are no government developed safety standards and no medical group or organization has ever said that it is safe. If Wi-Fi is so "safe", why did France ban WiFi for young children and allow only limited use for older children? Why are over a dozen countries issuing protective policies?
Continuous Exposure: MCPS parents should have been told that robust WiFi has been installed and that the WiFi will be on for the entire school day regardless of whether the students have a computer to use or not. They also have not been told that the radiation level is stronger then the WiFi radiation children receive at home or probably in any other setting. If you are an MCPS parent then your child is now exposed for the entire school day to microwave radiation without your consent. You cannot see or feel WiFi, but that does not mean it is not a risk.
Health Hazard: MCPS parents have not been told about the serious possible risks from wireless radiation and that ongoing research is still being done on long-term health effects.
WiFi may be everywhere, but we do not yet know the long term consequences of living in a 24-7 wireless environment. Limiting the wireless as much as possible, until more is known, makes sense and our kids deserve nothing less.
If we are open with parents and inform them of the possible health risks of WiFi in a school setting with wireless devices for every child, we can have a dialogue and come up with the best solutions. Safe Tech asked MCPS Chief Technology Officer Sherwin Collette if we could form a joint committee with parents and MCPS to discuss Best Practices, whether it be wired internet access, or WiFi on for only part of the day, etc. There are safer alternatives. Let's put the children's health as the top priority. At the very least, given the benefits MCPS claims for WiFi, one might expect MCPS to ask parents to sign a consent form acknowledging and accepting the risks.
Here Is Information MCPS Needs To Share
Here is a picture of what the access points at the schools look like. The access points are super strong industrial strength routers that are emitting radiation the entire school day. They have been placed on the ceiling, right above your children's desks. It is also possible your child might be sitting above an access point on the classroom ceiling below. The access points emit radiation for hundreds of feet and the radiation penetrates walls, ceiling, and floors.
The most dangerous place to be is sitting is right under or above an access point because that is where the radiation is strongest. When the laptops are used, that adds even more radiation that our children are absorbing.
Many parents have told us that they are requesting that there children be placed as far from the access points as possible.
“The IARC 2B classification (Wireless as a Class 2 B Carcinogen) implies an assurance of safety that cannot be offered—a particular concern, given the prospect that most of the world’s population will have lifelong exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.”
- Dr. Jonathan Samet, physician and epidemiologist, Chair of the World Health Organization’s EMF Working Group 2011. This statement is from his 2014 Commentary calling for more research.
Watch Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe discuss the science on children and wi-fi radiation.
April 1, 2015 Open letter to all daycares, preschools, and schools who continue to use wireless
radiation.
To All Principals, Staff, School Boards, Education Government, and Health officials,
In my capacity as a pediatric occupational therapist, biologist, speaker, and author on the subject
of the impact of technology on child development and learning, I’m writing to you on behalf of
students, teachers, and parents requesting the urgent removal of wireless radiation from all
school environments. I ask that you please take into consideration the following guiding principles
regarding wireless radiation, and make the decision to revert to Ethernet cabled only devices to
ensure immediate and ongoing safety for your students and staff.
Guiding principles for the decision to remove wireless radiation from school
environments:
Minimize Risk and Maximize Safety.
Wireless radiation has not been proven safe (WHO 2011).
Recent research indicates wireless radiation causes harmful effects to adult
humans (Avendano 2012, Hardell 2013).
Long term effects of wireless radiation on children are unknown at this time (AAP
2013).
Children have thinner skulls, more aqueous bodies, and have rapidly developing
cells, indicating they are exceedingly more vulnerable to harmful effects from
wireless radiation than adults (AAP 2013).
The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Canadian Pediatric Society
recommends no more than 1-2 hours total technology use per day, including
educational technology. Many schools exceed these expert guidelines (AAP
2014).
Weigh Risk vs. Benefit.
Education technology is not evidence based and is laden with conflict of interest
e.g. manufacturers claims are financially motivated, and are not substantiated by
university level research.
Traditional and standardized teaching methods have substantive research
support and evidence, yet are being rapidly replaced with education technology.
Risks associated with the use of technology by children are as follows:
Sedentary nature of technology use is causally related to the recent rise in obesity/diabetes, developmental delay and learning difficulties (Tremblay 2011, HELP EDI Mapping 2009/13, Ratey 2008, PISA 2012).
Isolating factor of technology use is associated with escalation in social impairments, mental illnesses (including adhd and autism), and self-
regulation difficulties (Houtrow 2014).
Overstimulation from technology use is a causal factor in rise in attention
deficit, aggression, sleep disturbance, and chronic stress from hyper-
arousal of the sympathetic nervous system (Christakis 2004, Gentile
2009, Markman 2010, Bristol University 2010).
Neglect of students by teachers and support staff who are engaged in
their own personal technology, is unfortunately common.
Consequently, the risks associated with using education technology far outweigh
the dubious benefits.
3. When In Doubt, Act With Caution.
Existing research on harmful effects of wireless radiation on adults, indicates
taking a cautionary approach when considering same radiation exposure to
children (AAP 2014). Rapid cell turnover in children creates particular concern
regarding potential DNA damage from wireless radiation, and consequent
susceptibility to cancer. While rise in cancer incidence is becoming more
apparent, rise in rates of cancer in children will not be observable until adulthood.
Removal of wireless radiation and reversion to Ethernet cabled devices, will
ensure immediate and long term safety to all students, teachers, and support
staff.
Defaulting to a remote authority regarding removing wireless radiation from
schools, is not acting in the best interests of students and staff, and may not be
defensible in a court of law.
The implications of failure of schools to act with caution now regarding wireless
radiation, are horrific in both scope and magnitude, and constitute neglect of
children.
For additional research references regarding the impact of technology on children, please see
below or visit www.zonein.ca, Fact Sheet under Info section. For any additional information,
please contact Cris Rowan at info@zonein.ca or 1888-8zonein.
The following Globe and Mail article by Sheryl Ubelecker on May 12, 2015 “Experts urge caution with use of wireless device” provides current status of government initiatives in the area of
addressing growing wireless radiation concerns.
Respectfully,
CRowan
Cris Rowan, BScBi, BScOT, SIPT, AOTA Approved Provider
CEO Zone’in Programs Inc. and Sunshine Coast Occupational Therapy Inc.
6840 Seaview Rd. Sechelt, BC CANADA V0N3A4
604-885-0986 p, 604-885-0389 f, 604-740-2264 c, crowan@zonein.ca email
Websites: www.zonein.ca, www.suncoastot.com, www.virtualchild.ca; Blog:
www.movingtolearn.ca Book: “Virtual Child – The terrifying truth about what technology is doing to children”
We hope that MCPS and PGCPS Officials will attend.
"Ongoing Research from the Indian Medical Research Council
on Wireless and Health"
Review of epidemiology and toxicology
George Washington University
The Milken Institute School of Public Health -
950 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20052
Tuesday, June 09th, 2015 – 11:30 AM
Lawmakers across our globe are developing safety rules for wireless technologies similar to laws around seat belts, lawn-pesticides, second hand smoke and tanning beds. These laws are designed to protect the public from potential harm. Emerging research shows harm at low levels of exposure to microwaves used by today's technology. Many people are unaware that wireless devices use microwaves, the same as your microwave oven. So your cordless phone, Wi-Fi, smart meter and the cell tower outside your window are in effect functioning as low-level microwave transmitters. Dr Davis will discuss the underlying science, her recent presentations to the Canadian Parliament and the Indian government and policy around the world including India, Canada and France. US municipalities are taking action as well such as the 2015 historic unanimous passage of Cell Phone Right to Know Ordinance, by Berkeley City Council, defended by Harvard Law Prof. Lawrence Lessig. Dr. Sharma will be reviewing recent research on wireless radiation and how Indian policy is changing in response. Can we be doing more? Meet the panel:
Dr. R.S. Sharma, Senior Deputy Director General & Scientist – G, Indian Council of Medical Research. A leader of the Indian federal government research on environmental health research.
Dr. Devra Davis, PhD MPH – Founder of the Environmental Health Trust, former Clinton Presidential appointee, founding Director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the National Academy of Sciences and award-winning author of Disconnect--the Truth About Cell Phone Radiation and National Book Award Finalist for When Smoke Ran Like Water
For more information, contact Janet Vasquez at 212-645-5498
About visiting scientist Dr. Sharma: Dr. Sharma is a fellow of the Indian National Academy of Medical Science, India, the World Health Organization and the Rockefeller Biotechnology Career. Aside from supervising the work of physicians, engineers and other medical professionals, Dr. Sharma is a government expert in the effects of RFR (Wireless radiation) on Health, Development of Male Contraception, Infertility and Assisted Reproduction. He has published approximately 125 papers in National and International Journals and edited ten books in related areas.
In his lecture at George Washington University, Dr. Sharma will be sharing important new Indian research showing biological effects from wireless radiofrequency radiation on bees, human DNA, the male and female reproductive and nervous systems. Dr. Sharma is currently co-ordinating the country’s largest epidemiological study on cell phones and their possible impact on neurological disorders, reproductive dysfunctions, cardiovascular disorders, hearing, memory, sleep patterns, reaction time and cancer.
MCPS is stating the radiation levels in classrooms "meet US Regulations" but...
US Regs are not federally developed safety standards.
They are maximum allowable radiation limits. (Adopted 18 years ago, not considering recent science)
Wi-Fi might be legal...hmm
The real question is ...are these guidelines safeguarding our children?
Do You Feel Comfortable With These Radiation Levels?
Below are pictures of radiation measurements taken by a concerned citizen at an MCPS elementary school classroom with a Cornet meter. We are deeply concerned because children are sitting under these devices every day.
36.47 mW/m² = 3.647 μW/cm² The following effects have been shown in research studies with this level of radiation (or lower).
Genetic changes in human white blood cells
Drop in NK lymphocytes (immune function decreased)
Slowed memory/altered immune function in children
Changed cell membrane acetylcholine-induced ion channels
Doubling of leukemia in adults Impaired nervous system activity
Calcium-efflux in cells - affects many cell functions.
Significant effect on immune function (mice)
Serum testosterone levels in mice
Two-fold increase in leukemia in children
Decreased survival in children with leukemia
Headaches, concentration problems, sleeping problems Affected kidney development in rats (in utero exposure) Pathological leakage in blood-brain barrier Affected human lymphocytes - stress response in cells
41.87 mW/m² = 4.187 μW/cm² The following effects have been shown in specific research studies with this level of radiation (or lower). Caused changes in hippocampus, part of the brain that deals with memory and learning. RFR decreased cell proliferation Affected calcium concentrations in heart muscle cells Affected production of free radicals in rat cells Negatively affected memory, attention, motor function Induced double-strand DNA damage in rat brain cells Caused irreversible infertility (in mice at 5 generations) Reduced memory function in rats Read the citations here.
These are radiation readings at a time when no laptops were in use. So we assume it is just the radiation from the router and access points. (Dozens are in the schools and mostly in classrooms) We wonder what the radiation levels will be when laptops are in use? We assume much much higher.
Having done experiments on cellular model systems we have found an effect from electromagnetic radiation from WiFi. I have strongly suggested for years now that they should be used only if absolutely necessary in the home and not at all in schools. There is no reason for having WiFi in schools since there is an alternative – wired connections which are safer and faster.
-Professor Lukas H. Margaritis, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Cell Biology and Radiobiology, Dept of Cell Biology and Biophysics, University of Athens, Greece. Read More.
Check out this comparison of Wireless Radiation guidelines.
The LA School District says this is safe = .1 μW/cm²
Salzberg Austria says this is safe = 0.0001 μW/cm²
Belgium (Brussels, Wallonia, Flanders) Bulgaria, Luxembourg and the Ukraine = 2.4 μW/cm²
The BioInitiative Reportrecommends .0003 to .0006 μW/cm² as a safety threshold.
4.187 μW/cm² in an elementary school classroom is NOT safe.
No documentation exists that these levels of radiation are "safe". Documentationdoes exist that these levels could be unsafe and hazardous.
FACT: Government Regulations Are NOT Adequate to Protect Our Children's Health.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, California Medical Association and countless other Doctors state that US FCC Regulations Do Not Protect Children. These codes are 18 years outdated, inadequate and irrelevant. Read More.
We are thankful that MCPS is going to bring in Independent testing but deeply concerned about the lack of transparency. At least one parent should be able to accompany the testing and see that measurements are being taken in the manner the laptops and other devices are used in the classroom. MCPS stated they would respond in writing after our meeting on May 5, 2015 but so far have not responded with a letter.
We might assume that Wi-Fi is safe ? Nope. Regulations and codes may be met, but that doesn't mean it is "safe". Not a single medical organization states that Wi-Fi is "safe".
Just because it is legal to put in a classroom, doesn't make it right.
Wi-Fi in the classroom could be a serious health hazard for students.
1. Worldwide Schools are Removing Wi-Fi.
Private schools in the United States are removing wireless networks due to health and safety issues. France has banned constant Wi-Fi in elementary schools and over a dozen countries and have enacted policies to reduce wireless radiation in the classroom.
2. Children are More Vulnerable than Adults.
According to the World Health Organization research shows that children can absorb up to 10 times more radiation in their bone marrow and have increased absorption into their brain in comparison to adults.
Wi-Fi in schools means that children are getting full body exposure to this radiation and no research has been done to understand how children absorb this radiation throughout their bodies. What will the impact be after 12 years of school? Children are not just little adults, their brains and immune systems are rapidly developing.
3. Wireless exposures at 100,000 times less than FCC guidelines have caused damage to mice, rats, bunnies, and humans in research studies.
According to the California Medical Association Wireless is a “new form of environmental pollution” and “ peer reviewed research has demonstrated adverse biological effects of wireless EMF including single and double stranded DNA breaks, creation of reactive oxygen species, immune dysfunction, cognitive processing effects, stress protein synthesis in the brain, altered brain development, sleep and memory disturbances, ADHD, abnormal behavior, sperm dysfunction, and brain tumors.” Check out the Research HERE.
4. Very Low Wi-Fi Levels Could Result in Early Dementia.
Volkow 2011, JAMA
Recent studies shows brain tissue damage and altered brain function from wireless levelswell below the legal limit. For example a recently published study on wireless equipment states that “long term exposure of 2.4 GHz RF (from Wi-Fi Equipment) may lead to adverse effects such as neurodegenerative diseases.” The authors state that this research shows that Wi-Fi may be a risk factor for Alzheimer and other diseases. Read it HERE.The study is only one of many studies showing nervous system damage. Read more.
5. Teacher Unions are Recommending Reduced Exposures
The United Federation of Teachers’ Wireless Radiation Webpage states, “Wireless radiation is emitted by the myriad of wireless devices we encounter every day. It was once thought to be relatively harmless. However, we now know that wireless radiation can cause non-thermal biological effects as well, including damage to cells and DNA,even at low levels." Several Teacher Unions and PTAs are calling for action. Read more.
Dr. Martha Herbert, a Harvard pediatric neurologist and expert in autism recommends Wi-Fi free schools. Read letters from her and other Doctors HERE. Hugh Taylor, Chief of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Yale Medicine and dozens of other doctors are recommending pregnant women reduce wireless exposure during pregnancy because of the risk of brain damage to the fetus. Learn more about the Baby Safe Project Here. What about pregnant teachers, pregnant staff and pregnant students?
7. The US NeverSet a "Safe Limit" for Wi-Fi in Schools.
We all think our government standards will protect us right? However, wireless got a free pass. There was barely pre-market safety testing. In fact, there are no federally developed safety standards for wireless in this country. The EPA and the FDA did NOT conduct research to set a “safe” level. Instead "permissible exposure levels" were adopted from the recommendations of an engineering group (not medical doctors). These regulations were last reviewed 18 years ago and are officially under review by the FCC with many scientists calling for stricter regulations to protect children. Why is our government relying on outdated laws under scrutiny and why are guidelines being used in place of safety limits?
The guidelines only account for short term heating - 30 minutes of exposure, not the long-term effect of a six hour school day. School exposures are far more than 30 minutes. Learn more. Read the letter from the American Academy of Pediatrics and from the EPA about how government standards do not protect the pediatric population from long term exposure.
Wi-Fi was not in existence like it is today when these guidelines were adapted. The guidelines were last reviewed in 1996!!
Using national tumor registry data, a recent study found that the overall incidence of meningioma, the most common non-malignant brain tumor which is associated with wireless use, has significantly increased in the United States in recent years ( Read MORE HERE. ). Wireless frequencies including Wi-Fi specifically are classified as a Class 2 B Carcinogen by the World Health Organization.
10. Wireless Networks in Schools Are 'Robust' Meaning High Powered, meaning A LOT of radiation.
School Wi-Fi is a much more powerful system than the router in your home.
The classroom access points and routers are meant to handle up to 30 devices in the room and in some classrooms, up to 100 This means a huge amount of radiation from each of these transmitters. Every school has somewhere between 30 to 80 access points depending on the size of the school, emitting radiation in the building. Even if students are not using wireless devices, the radiation signals are sent out every minute of the day from these access points. The radiation moves through the room and our children's bodies are absorbing it all day long.
Just because it is legal, doesn't make it right. Wi-Fi in the classroom could be a serious health hazard for students. Safer alternatives exist, there is no need to risk anyone's health.
Sign up for blog updates now so you never miss a post.
Please email anytime at safetechforschoolsmaryland@gmail.com
Please join our Facebook Page at Safe Tech For Schools Maryland
7:00AM BST 09 May 2015
Six years ago, Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe moved to the country, stopped carrying a mobile phone and sacrificed a successful career in emergency medicine to focus on a new medical interest – radiation emitted by Wi-Fi, mobiles and other wireless devices.
She is now one of the country’s few professional advisers on medical conditions related to radiofrequency (RF) radiation and other electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
“I was using wireless devices before most people I knew – I loved it,” says Mallery-Blythe, who was ahead of the tech trend even in 1985 when she was handed her first mobile phone, aged 10.
“But as soon as I started digesting the literature on EMFs it was a no-brainer,” she says of her decision to relinquish wireless gadgets.
“I wasn’t willing to take that kind of risk for something that was purely convenient.”
Her interest in EMFs started in 2009 after she began noticing increasing trends in certain symptoms – headaches, insomnia, fatigue and palpitations, but also more serious conditions including brain tumours in young people, fertility problems and accelerating neurological diseases such as early onset Alzheimer’s and autism. As yet there is still no scientific proof that relates these diseases to radiation, but Mallery-Blythe is among a not insignificant number of scientists and practitioners concerned by those studies that do highlight cause for more precaution.
Over the past few years, as Wi-Fi, laptops and iPads have become increasingly prevalent in classrooms, Mallery-Blythe says “hundreds” of families have sought her help with what they believe to be EMF-related diseases and health issues.
One such case is that of nine-year-old Jessica Lewis’s family. In the autumn term of 2011, Jessica started to complain that she was getting bad headaches at school. She was also feeling overly tired, developed rashes on her legs and her parents said she looked “completely washed out” after school, particularly on Mondays. A quick internet search threw up a forum where parents had written that their children complained of similar symptoms after installing Wi-Fi.
“I ignored it. We didn’t know anything about Wi-Fi then,” says Jessica’s father, Paul Lewis. “We didn’t think her school had it.”
Later that term, at a parents’ evening, he noticed a Wi-Fi router near Jessica’s desk in her new form classroom. As it turned out, Monday was the day of the week the whole class worked on laptops.
When a local GP backed up Lewis’s suspicions about Wi-Fi being the probable cause of Jessica’s headaches, he went to some lengths to try to convince Spotbrough Copley Junior School in Doncaster to use wires instead of Wi-Fi, even offering to pay for the school building to be wired with cables.
The school pointed out that a government report advised that Wi-Fi exposures were well within internationally accepted standards. Guidelines were reviewed in 2011 and still stand today. “We do not think the balance of available scientific evidence on radiofrequency has shifted and, as such, our position remains that PHE [Public Health England] sees no reason why Wi-Fi should not continue to be used in schools and in other places,” says Dr Simon Mann at PHE, the Department of Health’s agency in charge of health protection.
“That just didn’t add up,” says Lewis. Now Jessica is home-schooled, much to her frustration, because symptoms resurface when she’s exposed to Wi-Fi.
In February, insurance market Lloyd’s of London informed schools that it was excluding liability coverage for injuries “resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise”, which means that school officials could be personally liable for exposing children and staff to microwave radiation.
“The Government is expecting head teachers to decide whether risk versus benefit is worthwhile. This seems unfair to me,” says Mallery-Blythe. “Most teachers don’t even know that RF is currently classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means it is a possible cause of cancer in humans. There is a vast amount of published literature documenting the harmful effects on every biological system. Most people understandably don’t have time to read and digest it all.”
As well as founding the Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment (PHIRE) to inform doctors of the issues and advise on best health practice, Mallery-Blythe gives talks to teachers around the country, in which she presents scientific studies that reveal both short and long-term effects of EMF exposure. One of the talks (below) has had more than 15,000 views on YouTube since last November. It’s an engaging summary of the issues that concerned scientists are discussing. “I try to present the facts the authorities aren’t highlighting,” says Mallery-Blythe.
I was surprised to find myself glued to it. Particularly eye-opening are the number of widely held misconceptions about radiation safety that Mallery-Blythe sets about busting. Standing a good distance away from a Wi-Fi router may reduce radiation intensity, for example, but low-intensity windows of radiation have been shown to be more harmful in some studies than higher-intensity exposures.
“At the moment people think their children are safe because the router is far away – or we don’t have to worry about the phone because it’s not near the brain. That’s common sense but unfortunately we now know it’s not quite true,” she says, pointing out that the brain is better protected than some more vulnerable parts of the body.
Are theDepartment of Healthand PHE doing too little? “My main issue with the PHE’s stance is that it’s contradictory,” says Mallery-Blythe.
“They’ve issued a caution saying children under 16 shouldn’t be using mobile phones except for essential calls, but they’ve been quite happy to support the one-to-one iPad scheme, though an iPad can have an equivalent or higher SAR (the rate at which energy is absorbed by the human body when exposed to a radio frequency) than a phone.”
Associate Professor Olle Johansson, a neuroscientist at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, compares putting an iPhone near a baby’s head to “putting it next to several electric train engines”, pointing out that working with train engines is Sweden’s highest occupational exposure allowance.
Johansson has been researching the biological effects of radiofrequency (RF) wireless radiation for more than 30 years, but says it has become “extremely hard to get funding” in this area. “Given the importance of the subject I’d say that’s more than enigmatic.”
He predicts a “paradigm shift” in attitudes towards EMF. We are currently living in an environment estimated to contain more than 10 billion times more RF radiation than it did in the Sixties. “If this environment is safe we’re talking about in the order of 15,000 to 25,000 papers – in peer-reviewed scientific journals – all being wrong. That has never happened before.”
“We just want to see some precautionary action put in place, and we’re not seeing it.”
Wi-Fi at home: Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe’s advice
Try to keep your mobile switched off and don’t use it unless you need to. Keep it in flight mode when it is on and never carry your mobile close to your body, even on standby.
Don’t use Wi-Fi for internet. Instead use an Ethernet cable and buy a router with no wireless capacity or disable it. Disable Wi-Fi on your computer or tablet by disabling the wireless card via the control panel or putting it into flight mode.
Replace cordless landlines with corded ones. Most cordless telephones give off radiation whether they’re in use or not.
Background
In February the French government banned Wi-Fi in nursery schoolsand restricted use in primary schools. The German government has recommended that the use of Wi-Fi in the workplace or home should be avoided where possible. LA has reduced student exposure to Wi-Fi radiation to 10,000 times below US government standard.
In 2000, a report commissioned by the Government concluded that no school should fall within 100 metres of a mobile phone mast; in 2007 a BBC Panorama programme found that the readings next to a classroom laptop showed radiation at double the level only 100 metres from a mobile phone mast.
A five-year-old absorbs up to 60 per cent more radiation than an adult due largely to their thinner skulls and the high water content of a young body. In Western countries brain tumours have overtaken leukaemia as the most common cause of cancer in children.
A 2008 study found afivefold increase in the risk of glioma(a form of brain cancer now recognised by the World Health Organisation as being linked to mobile phone usage) for those starting mobile phone use under 20 years of age, indicating that the age group at first use is highly significant.
UK Schools and parents can find out more through ssita.org.uk
This article is online at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/wellbeing/11589857/Is-Wi-Fi-making-your-child-ill.html
Sign up for blog updates so you never miss a post.
Please email anytime at safetechforschoolsmaryland@gmail.com
Please join our Facebook Page at Safe Tech For Schools Maryland
